One of my
mentors said “The problem with instructors is that after a while we think we
have found the one true path and that everyone else is an idiot.”
I think the
truth is that we discover the one true path for us and we are idiots like
everyone else.
All joking
aside after a few years of intense studying a specific subject one begins to
have insights. Those insights can lead
to a deep understanding of the subject.
Then, if you are lucky, you meet someone who has a completely different
perspective. It takes discipline to shut
up and listen but if you do there is a potential for a “paradigm shift.” I dislike buzz words but sometimes they
capture the idea. When people accepted
that light acted like a particle AND a wave minds were blown and progress
occurred. The “pitch for airspeed and
power for altitude” Bernoulli or Newton
and other mental models are useful but not comprehensive. It is difficult not to cement our minds into
the theory that we understand and disregard others.
On the
other hand, people who tout their ability to “think outside the box” sometimes
are merely undisciplined. A basic
understanding of the current theories and ideas about a subject allows one to
have an intelligent conversation based on something other than conjecture. I do not have a problem with someone who says
“I believe __” and does not try to disparage people who believe otherwise. The people who say “I think” and then merely
regurgitate someone else’s opinion can be frustrating. I used to enjoy agitating people like that,
now I generally avoid them. This is the
dilemma, if I think I understand the problem better than them; could be I
missing a jewel of an insight by ignoring them or am I being an arrogant fool?